Is picalica.com a scam site? Scam, spam & reviews

Score ⓘ

HTTP status ⓘ

SSL/TLS ⓘ

Invalid

Server/AS ⓘ

192.168.0.254

Open site

Scores & key points

Security

Reputation

Scam risk

Caution signals ⓘ

[Low] WHOIS information is masked/private.
[Medium] No valid SSL/TLS certificate found.

Reputation

Open PageRank ⓘ 2.24 / 10

Tranco ⓘ - Global

Source: sqlite

Review summary — picalica.com

Overall 70 (Use with caution)

Some security settings are missing or not disclosed, so it should be used with care.

Strengths

SPF configured
DMARC configured
Domain age ≥ 1 year

Weaknesses

No valid SSL/TLS certificate
HSTS not set
CSP not set

Detailed review — picalica.com

Domain review

Domain created: 2012-06-15T09:12:14Z (≈ 13y 8m). Registrar: NAMECHEAP INC. Hosting / AS: NA. Popularity: OPR 2.24/10. Reputation: GSB clean WebRisk clean. Email security: SPF On, DMARC quarantine.

Shop / transaction review

No mixed content detected. No mixed content detected. Structured data: Organization Absent, contactPoint Absent. Hidden text ratio 0%.

Technical review

HSTS Off (preload: Unknown). Applies 0/6 security headers. DNSSEC Off. Email security: SPF On, DMARC quarantine. MTA‑STS policy: None. TLS‑RPT Off. security.txt: not available. JS obfuscation score 0. Reputation: GSB clean, WebRisk clean → overall Good.

Explanation — strengths and stability

Age: about (≈ 13y 8m) (created on 2012-06-15T09:12:14Z).

GSB clean

WebRisk clean

Email security: SPF On, DMARC quarantine.

No mixed content detected.

Looking at operator information together with trust metrics helps you judge brand/merchant consistency and the likelihood of long‑term operation.

Checking payment page security (HTTPS enforcement, form target host consistency, script integrity) along with customer support and return policy gives a more accurate sense of real‑world trust.

In parallel, applying security headers, automated certificate renewal, email domain protection (DMARC/TLS‑RPT), and removing mixed content will improve overall reliability and delivery/search stability.

Explanation — risks and areas to improve

Without HSTS, downgrade and man‑in‑the‑middle attacks can weaken HTTPS enforcement. Enable HSTS and prepare for preload registration.

Missing key security headers leaves the site vulnerable to clickjacking, MIME sniffing, and data leakage.

Without DNSSEC, trust relies solely on parent name servers and DNS tampering risks can be higher in some environments.

Without MTA‑STS, SMTP TLS enforcement is weaker.

Without TLS‑RPT, it is harder to collect TLS failure signals and operational insight.

Without security.txt, the vulnerability disclosure channel is unclear and response may be delayed.

Looking at operator information together with trust metrics helps you judge brand/merchant consistency and the likelihood of long‑term operation.

Estimated domain age ⓘ

13y 8m

Registrar ⓘ

NAMECHEAP INC

Registrant / organization ⓘ

Privacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf

SSL valid ⓘ

Server / ASN ⓘ

Final URL ⓘ

https://picalica.com/

SPF

Yes

DMARC

Yes

CT wildcard usage ⓘ

Yes

HSTS preload ⓘ

Unknown

security.txt ⓘ

TLS‑RPT receivers ⓘ

Absent

Domain creation date ⓘ

2012-06-15T09:12:14Z

Hosting / AS ⓘ

GSB status ⓘ

No match

WebRisk status ⓘ

No match

DMARC policy

quarantine

DNSSEC ⓘ

Absent

Legal/contact pages

Structured data: Organization ⓘ

Absent

Structured data: contactPoint ⓘ

Absent

Registry risk (0–100) ⓘ

dmarc_p ⓘ

quarantine

dmarc_align ⓘ

s/s

mixed_http ⓘ

JS obfuscation score ⓘ

Payment logo count ⓘ

Hidden text ratio (%) ⓘ

Cross‑domain POST form count ⓘ

External host logos/icons ⓘ

YARA matches ⓘ

This analysis is an automated, data‑based opinion for reference only. Please verify the information yourself before paying or downloading anything.

About this report

First analysis: -
Last updated: 2026-02-14 15:48:57

Traffic signals

UTM source -

UTM medium -

ref / from -

Shortened URLs on page 0

Security headers

HSTS ⓘ
Content‑Security‑Policy ⓘ
X‑Content‑Type‑Options ⓘ
X‑Frame‑Options ⓘ
Referrer‑Policy ⓘ
Permissions‑Policy ⓘ

Enable HSTS

ⓘ

add_header Strict-Transport-Security "max-age=15552000; includeSubDomains; preload" always;

Set CSP

This is a minimal CSP example. Adjust allowed sources to your project.

ⓘ

add_header Content-Security-Policy "default-src 'self'; img-src 'self' data:; object-src 'none'; base-uri 'self'";

Prevent content type sniffing

ⓘ

add_header X-Content-Type-Options "nosniff" always;

Prevent clickjacking

ⓘ

add_header X-Frame-Options "SAMEORIGIN" always;

Set Referrer‑Policy

ⓘ

add_header Referrer-Policy "strict-origin-when-cross-origin" always;

Set Permissions‑Policy

ⓘ

add_header Permissions-Policy "geolocation=(); microphone=(); camera=()" always;

Domain lineage

2012-06-15

Domain registered: 2012-06-15T09:12:14Z

Essentials

Google Safe Browsingⓘ No match

Google Web Riskⓘ No match

AbuseIPDBⓘ 0%

SPFⓘ Configured

DMARCⓘ Configured

DNSSECⓘ No

Cookie security ⓘ Absent

Mixed content (http)ⓘ 0

Legal pages ⓘ Absent

DMARC details

DMARC policy (p): quarantine

DKIM alignment (adkim): s

SPF alignment (aspf): s

TXT: v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;v=DMARC1; p=quarantine; adkim=s; aspf=s;

HTTP statusⓘ-

Server ⓘ NA

CDN / Hosting ⓘ Other CDN

HSTSⓘNo

Valid untilⓘ-

Issuerⓘ-

Registrant / organizationⓘPrivacy service provided by Withheld for Privacy ehf

RegistrarⓘNAMECHEAP INC

ASNⓘ-

Networkⓘ10.0.0.0/8

Titleⓘ-

Final URL: -

Threat insight

Mostly safe (risk 33/100)

Using invalid or expired SSL/TLS certificates triggers browser warnings and increases the risk of man‑in‑the‑middle attacks or confusion with phishing sites. Check certificate status regularly.
Without HSTS, downgrade and man‑in‑the‑middle attacks can weaken HTTPS enforcement. Enable HSTS and prepare for preload registration.
Missing key security headers leaves the site vulnerable to clickjacking, MIME sniffing, and data leakage.

The risk score of this site is calculated by combining browser security headers, SSL status, mixed content, email domain protection (SPF/DMARC), redirect/obfuscation patterns, and the results of Google Safe Browsing and WebRisk. There are currently few clear signs of malicious behavior, but insufficient security headers or email protection can increase the risk of phishing or man‑in‑the‑middle attacks. Before entering important information, re‑check the domain spelling and how you reached the site (ads, DMs, shortened URLs, etc.). Before entering payment or personal information, verify operator information (company/contact), HTTPS enforcement, DMARC/TLS‑RPT, and check for mixed content.

Deep scan (HTML / headers)

Mostly safe (deep 0/100)

Before entering payment or personal information, verify the site operator/contact, HTTPS enforcement (HSTS), and the presence of DMARC and TLS‑RPT.

HTTP status (deep) -

Set‑Cookie (count) 0

Cookie security insufficient Secure×0 / HttpOnly×0 / SameSite×0

HTTP resources (deep) 0

Top third‑party hosts 0

Collection time: 2026-02-14T15:48:54+00:00

User scenarios

If you make a payment on this site

Some technical or reputation signals suggest caution. Check the address bar, HTTPS and browser warnings before entering payment details. Mixed or non-encrypted (HTTP) resources or weak TLS can expose payment data or session tokens on some networks.