Is bild.de a scam site? Scam, spam & reviews
Scores & key points
Overview
German news website
Caution signals ⓘ
No clear warnings detected.
Reputation
Review summary — bild.de
Overall 87 (Mostly safe)Multiple security indicators are favorable and there are few major risk signals.
Strengths
- Valid SSL/TLS certificate
- HSTS enabled
- CSP enabled
- SPF configured
- DMARC configured
Weaknesses
Detailed review — bild.de
Domain review
Hosting / AS: Apache — Japan. Popularity: Tranco #846, OPR 5.90/10. Reputation: GSB clean WebRisk clean. Email security: SPF On, DMARC reject. Certificate valid until: 2026-01-11T23:59:59+00:00.
Shop / transaction review
No mixed content detected. No mixed content detected. Structured data: Organization Absent, contactPoint Absent. Hidden text ratio 0%.
Technical review
HTTP 200 Success · Server Apache. HSTS On (preload: Unknown). Applies 3/6 security headers. DNSSEC Off. Email security: SPF On, DMARC reject. MTA‑STS policy: None. TLS‑RPT Off. security.txt: available (https://bild.de/.well-known/security.txt). JS obfuscation score 0. Reputation: GSB clean, WebRisk clean → overall Good.
Explanation — strengths and stability
GSB clean
WebRisk clean
Certificate valid until: 2026-01-11T23:59:59+00:00.
Email security: SPF On, DMARC reject.
Applies 3/6 security headers.
No mixed content detected.
Looking at operator information together with trust metrics helps you judge brand/merchant consistency and the likelihood of long‑term operation.
Checking payment page security (HTTPS enforcement, form target host consistency, script integrity) along with customer support and return policy gives a more accurate sense of real‑world trust.
In parallel, applying security headers, automated certificate renewal, email domain protection (DMARC/TLS‑RPT), and removing mixed content will improve overall reliability and delivery/search stability.
Explanation — risks and areas to improve
Missing key security headers leaves the site vulnerable to clickjacking, MIME sniffing, and data leakage.
Without DNSSEC, trust relies solely on parent name servers and DNS tampering risks can be higher in some environments.
Without MTA‑STS, SMTP TLS enforcement is weaker.
Without TLS‑RPT, it is harder to collect TLS failure signals and operational insight.
Looking at operator information together with trust metrics helps you judge brand/merchant consistency and the likelihood of long‑term operation.
Checking payment page security (HTTPS enforcement, form target host consistency, script integrity) along with customer support and return policy gives a more accurate sense of real‑world trust.
This analysis is an automated, data‑based opinion for reference only. Please verify the information yourself before paying or downloading anything.
About this report
- First analysis: -
- Last updated: 2025-12-03 10:03:16
Claim website ownership
Traffic signals
Performance
Security headers
- HSTS ⓘ
- Content‑Security‑Policy ⓘ
- X‑Content‑Type‑Options ⓘ
- X‑Frame‑Options ⓘ
- Referrer‑Policy ⓘ
- Permissions‑Policy ⓘ
add_header X-Frame-Options "SAMEORIGIN" always;
add_header Referrer-Policy "strict-origin-when-cross-origin" always;
add_header Permissions-Policy "geolocation=(); microphone=(); camera=()" always;
Essentials
DMARC details
v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-rua@dkim10888.de; ruf=mailto:dmarc-ruf@dkim10888.dev=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=none; rua=mailto:dmarc-rua@dkim10888.de; ruf=mailto:dmarc-ruf@dkim10888.deThreat insight
- HTTP resources found on HTTPS page
- Suspicious JavaScript patterns detected
The risk score of this site is calculated by combining browser security headers, SSL status, mixed content, email domain protection (SPF/DMARC), redirect/obfuscation patterns, and the results of Google Safe Browsing and WebRisk. There are currently few clear signs of malicious behavior, but insufficient security headers or email protection can increase the risk of phishing or man‑in‑the‑middle attacks. Before entering important information, re‑check the domain spelling and how you reached the site (ads, DMs, shortened URLs, etc.). Before entering payment or personal information, verify operator information (company/contact), HTTPS enforcement, DMARC/TLS‑RPT, and check for mixed content.
Deep scan (HTML / headers)
- Unencrypted (HTTP) resources are being loaded.
- Suspicious JavaScript obfuscation patterns have been observed.
- The site heavily relies on third‑party resources.
If possible, configure the site to use HTTPS only and replace HTTP resources in the page with HTTPS. If unexpected popups, wallet connection requests, or download prompts appear, cancel once and re‑check via official announcements or community channels.
Show examples of HTTP resources
http://www.bild.de/rss-feeds/rss-16725492,feed=home.bild.html
User scenarios
If you make a payment on this site
Some technical or reputation signals suggest caution. Check the address bar, HTTPS and browser warnings before entering payment details. Mixed or non-encrypted (HTTP) resources or weak TLS can expose payment data or session tokens on some networks.
If you log in or enter personal data
No clear malicious patterns were found, but treat passwords and 2FA codes as highly sensitive. Avoid reusing passwords across sites.
Server location ⓘ
History
Change ⓘ --Recently added sites
Reviews
Average - / total 0
Checksum 9ec1eae170c11aa606d6d1b5da3e9ef52b44e08ff8c3d612d0f69870f8c7c62d
Social ⓘ
Platforms that this site may be using.